News | Politics | Sports | Random Musings

Open Carry Questions After Guns Brandished at North Charleston Mall


The North Charleston mall incident, where individuals were seen brandishing guns, has sparked significant concern and debate across South Carolina. This event occurred in the context of the state’s newly implemented open carry law, which has been both hailed as a victory for Second Amendment rights and criticized for its potential to increase public safety risks.

Details of the Incident

On a bustling weekend afternoon at the North Charleston mall, several individuals were observed openly carrying firearms, causing panic among shoppers and prompting a swift response from law enforcement. Eyewitnesses reported that the sight of visible guns led to a chaotic scene, with people rushing to find safety and store owners locking their doors. Fortunately, no shots were fired, and the situation was de-escalated without physical harm. However, the psychological impact on those present was profound, highlighting the immediate implications of South Carolina’s new gun laws.

The New Open Carry Law

South Carolina’s Constitutional Carry/Second Amendment Preservation Act, effective from March 2024, significantly alters the landscape of firearm regulations in the state. The law allows any adult who can legally own a gun to carry it openly or concealed without a permit or specific training (Axelrod & Associates, P.A.) . This shift aligns the state with the majority of the country, where similar laws are in place. Proponents argue that it upholds citizens’ rights to self-defense and reduces bureaucratic hurdles for law-abiding gun owners.

Governor Henry McMaster, a strong advocate for the law, celebrated its passage, emphasizing the enhancement of personal freedoms and self-defense rights for South Carolinians (Bearing Arms) . However, the North Charleston incident has brought to light several concerns and criticisms about the law’s practical implications.

Community and Law Enforcement Reactions

The reaction from various community leaders and law enforcement officials has been mixed, reflecting the broader national debate on gun control and rights. Organizations like Positive Vibes Ronjanae Smith Inc., which was named in memory of a young girl killed in gang violence, have voiced strong opposition to the law. They argue that increasing the visibility and accessibility of firearms could exacerbate violence, particularly in vulnerable communities (Bearing Arms) . Ronald Smith, co-founder of the organization, expressed his fear that the law might lead to more incidents of gun violence and accidental harm.

Law enforcement officials also share these concerns. They worry about the increased difficulty in distinguishing between lawful gun carriers and potential threats in high-stress situations. The incident at the mall underscores these fears, as the mere presence of openly carried firearms created a panic that required significant police resources to manage.

Broader Implications

The North Charleston incident serves as a crucial case study in understanding the broader implications of South Carolina’s new gun laws. It highlights the need for ongoing public education about the specifics of the law, including where guns can and cannot be carried. For instance, despite the law’s broad permissions, there are still several locations where carrying firearms remains prohibited, such as schools, courthouses, and private properties that explicitly ban them (Axelrod & Associates, P.A.) .

Moreover, the incident calls attention to the psychological impact of seeing firearms in public spaces. While some citizens may feel safer knowing they can openly carry firearms, others may feel threatened and insecure, leading to heightened tensions and potential conflicts.

Moving Forward

To address these challenges, a multi-faceted approach is required. This could include:

  • Enhanced Public Education: Informing citizens about their rights and responsibilities under the new law, including clear guidelines on where firearms are prohibited.
  • Community Engagement: Involving community leaders and organizations in discussions about the law’s impact and exploring ways to mitigate potential risks.
  • Law Enforcement Training: Providing additional training for police officers to effectively manage situations involving open carry without escalating tensions.

While the new open carry law in South Carolina represents a significant shift towards greater personal freedom for gun owners, the North Charleston mall incident highlights the complex and often contentious nature of such legislative changes. It underscores the importance of balancing individual rights with public safety and the need for ongoing dialogue and education to navigate these challenges effectively

Share this Article